Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Pornopedia/2010-May porn purge - Revision history

Ockham: /* Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship' */

2010-05-13T15:13:36Z

Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship'

Ockham: /* Wikipedia culture */

2010-05-11T21:41:51Z

Wikipedia culture

Ockham: /* Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship' */

2010-05-11T20:20:20Z

Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship'

Ockham: /* Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship' */

2010-05-11T20:20:08Z

Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship'

Ockham: /* Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship' */

2010-05-11T20:19:50Z

Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship'

Ockham at 20:19, 11 May 2010

2010-05-11T20:19:34Z

Ockham: /* Material that was always there */

2010-05-11T20:15:00Z

Material that was always there

Ockham: /* News coverage */

2010-05-11T20:02:17Z

News coverage

Ockham: /* Reaction of Wikimedia foundation */

2010-05-11T17:08:40Z

Reaction of Wikimedia foundation

Ockham: /* Reaction of Wikimedia foundation */

2010-05-11T17:02:25Z

Reaction of Wikimedia foundation

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 13 May 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:
	Wise words from a respected contributor to Wikipedia Review [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=29506&view=findpost&p=236129].		Wise words from a respected contributor to Wikipedia Review [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=29506&view=findpost&p=236129].

−	:No school, with children, should be allowed to have ANY access to Wikipedia.	+	:No school, with children, should be allowed to have ANY access to Wikipedia. School boards and library boards should consider Wikipedia to be pornographic website catering to pedophiles, and Namblers, and as such, has a reputation for its lack of control, governance and responsibility to its patrons. Wikipedia should be banned from any respectable institution of learning.
−	:School boards and library boards should consider Wikipedia to be pornographic website catering to pedophiles, and Namblers, and as such, has a reputation for its lack of control, governance and responsibility to its patrons. Wikipedia should be banned from any respectable institution of learning.

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 *[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)&oldid=360967824#Re-upload_Commons_artwork_that.27s_been_deleted_by_Jimbo_Wales Village pump discussion]
 *[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&oldid=39105308#I_have_responded Don't think about the children]
 == Wales attacked by the community==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 11 May 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:

	:No school, with children, should be allowed to have ANY access to Wikipedia.		:No school, with children, should be allowed to have ANY access to Wikipedia.
−	:School boards and library boards should consider Wikipedia to be pornographic website	+	:School boards and library boards should consider Wikipedia to be pornographic website catering to pedophiles, and Namblers, and as such, has a reputation for its lack of control, governance and responsibility to its patrons. Wikipedia should be banned from any respectable institution of learning.
−	catering to pedophiles, and Namblers, and as such, has a reputation for its lack of control, governance and responsibility to its patrons. Wikipedia should be banned from any
−	respectable institution of learning.

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 :No school, with children, should be allowed to have ANY access to Wikipedia.
 :School boards and library boards should consider Wikipedia to be pornographic website
-catering to pedophiles, and Namblers, and as such, has a reputation for it's lack of control,
+catering to pedophiles, and Namblers, and as such, has a reputation for its lack of control, governance and responsibility to its patrons. Wikipedia should be banned from any
 respectable institution of learning.

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 :No school, with children, should be allowed to have ANY access to Wikipedia.
-School boards and library boards should consider Wikipedia to be pornographic website
+:School boards and library boards should consider Wikipedia to be pornographic website
 catering to pedophiles, and Namblers, and as such, has a reputation for it's lack of control,
 governance and responsibility to it's patrons. Wikipedia should be banned from any
 respectable institution of learning.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 11 May 2010
Line 55:		Line 55:
	* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaannounce-l/2010-May/000008.html Statement by Michael Snow]		* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaannounce-l/2010-May/000008.html Statement by Michael Snow]
	*[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/057800.html Statement by Sydney Poore] "I support the clean up effort by Jimmy and the administrators on Commons for the images that have no significant educational value. I also understand that to some editors who are new to thinking about the issue that this may seem abrupt. So, I encourage good communication between all the stakeholders so that we can understand each others concerns and address them."		*[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/057800.html Statement by Sydney Poore] "I support the clean up effort by Jimmy and the administrators on Commons for the images that have no significant educational value. I also understand that to some editors who are new to thinking about the issue that this may seem abrupt. So, I encourage good communication between all the stakeholders so that we can understand each others concerns and address them."
		+
		+	==Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship'==
		+
		+	Wise words from a respected contributor to Wikipedia Review [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=29506&view=findpost&p=236129].
		+
		+	:No school, with children, should be allowed to have ANY access to Wikipedia.
		+	School boards and library boards should consider Wikipedia to be pornographic website
		+	catering to pedophiles, and Namblers, and as such, has a reputation for it's lack of control,
		+	governance and responsibility to it's patrons. Wikipedia should be banned from any
		+	respectable institution of learning.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 *[http://webcitation.org/query.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcommons.wikimedia.org%2Fwiki%2FFile%3ALolimanga.JPG Wikipedia editor's child porn collection] (now deleted).
 *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Bad_image_list Bad images]
 ==Debates on the Commons and Meta-wiki==

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/7711486/Wikipedia-porn-row-sees-founder-give-up-his-editing-privileges.html Wikipedia-porn-row-sees-founder-give-up-his-editing-privileges] Daily Telegraph 11 May
 *[http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1635810/wikipedia-roiled-porn-row Wikipedia roiled by porn row] The Inquirer 11 May
 ==Wales' purge==

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:08, 11 May 2010
Line 52:		Line 52:
	** [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058092.html I'm sorry I acted with such urgency]		** [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058092.html I'm sorry I acted with such urgency]
	* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaannounce-l/2010-May/000008.html Statement by Michael Snow]		* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaannounce-l/2010-May/000008.html Statement by Michael Snow]
		+	*[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/057800.html Statement by Sydney Poore] "I support the clean up effort by Jimmy and the administrators on Commons for the images that have no significant educational value. I also understand that to some editors who are new to thinking about the issue that this may seem abrupt. So, I encourage good communication between all the stakeholders so that we can understand each others concerns and address them."

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 11 May 2010
Line 51:		Line 51:
	*[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058091.html Wales admits deletions to foundation]		*[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058091.html Wales admits deletions to foundation]
	** [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058092.html I'm sorry I acted with such urgency]		** [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058092.html I'm sorry I acted with such urgency]
		+	* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaannounce-l/2010-May/000008.html Statement by Michael Snow]